Tensions are rising as outspoken lawmaker Alhassan Suhuyini doubles down on his controversial position on sole sourcing, declaring emphatically that he and his allies are standing firm—no matter the backlash.
In a statement that has sparked fresh political fireworks, Suhuyini made it clear that there will be no retreat, no revision, and no apology. “We still stand by what we said,” he asserted, sending a strong signal to critics who have questioned the transparency and fairness of sole sourcing practices.
The issue of sole sourcing—where contracts are awarded without competitive bidding—has long been a flashpoint in governance discussions. Critics argue it opens the door to abuse, favoritism, and lack of accountability. But Suhuyini isn’t having it.
According to him, the position taken is grounded in principle, not politics. He insists that the narrative surrounding sole sourcing has been distorted, and that under the right conditions, it remains a legitimate and necessary procurement method.
His remarks have reignited a fierce national conversation, with supporters rallying behind his defiance while opponents demand greater scrutiny and reform.
Political analysts say this latest declaration could deepen divisions, especially as calls for transparency grow louder. Yet, if Suhuyini’s message is anything to go by, he’s ready for the fight.
One thing is certain: this battle over sole sourcing is far from over—and the stakes for accountability, governance, and public trust have never been higher.
