Tag: Alhassan Suhuyini

Tensions are rising as outspoken lawmaker Alhassan Suhuyini doubles down on his controversial position on sole sourcing, declaring emphatically that he and his allies are standing firm—no matter the backlash.

In a statement that has sparked fresh political fireworks, Suhuyini made it clear that there will be no retreat, no revision, and no apology. “We still stand by what we said,” he asserted, sending a strong signal to critics who have questioned the transparency and fairness of sole sourcing practices.

The issue of sole sourcing—where contracts are awarded without competitive bidding—has long been a flashpoint in governance discussions. Critics argue it opens the door to abuse, favoritism, and lack of accountability. But Suhuyini isn’t having it.

According to him, the position taken is grounded in principle, not politics. He insists that the narrative surrounding sole sourcing has been distorted, and that under the right conditions, it remains a legitimate and necessary procurement method.

His remarks have reignited a fierce national conversation, with supporters rallying behind his defiance while opponents demand greater scrutiny and reform.

Political analysts say this latest declaration could deepen divisions, especially as calls for transparency grow louder. Yet, if Suhuyini’s message is anything to go by, he’s ready for the fight.

One thing is certain: this battle over sole sourcing is far from over—and the stakes for accountability, governance, and public trust have never been higher.

In a statement that is sending shockwaves through political and business circles, Alhassan Suhuyini has pushed back against claims that all “Big Push” projects were handed out via sole sourcing, insisting that transparency and competitive bidding played a central role in the initiative.

Addressing concerns over procurement integrity, Suhuyini emphasized that while some projects may have required expedited processes, the majority underwent rigorous evaluation and adhered to standard procedures. “It is misleading to suggest that the government bypassed due process entirely. The Big Push was designed to accelerate development while maintaining accountability,” he asserted.

Political analysts note that the clarification comes amid heightened scrutiny over government spending and project implementation. Critics have accused officials of favoritism and lack of transparency, but Suhuyini’s remarks appear aimed at restoring confidence and defending the administration’s track record.

Supporters of the policy hailed the explanation, pointing out that the initiative has led to visible improvements in infrastructure, education, and local industry, reinforcing the notion that Ghana’s development agenda can proceed efficiently without compromising fairness.

As debates continue, one thing is clear: the Big Push remains both a symbol of ambition and a lightning rod for controversy, with procurement practices under the microscope like never before.