Author: Daniel Sasu

The shocking murder of a student at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology has taken a darker turn after investigators disclosed a chilling statement allegedly made by the main suspect. According to family accounts, the suspect declared, “If she can’t be for me, she can’t be for anybody,” in reference to the victim — a line that has sent shockwaves through the university community and beyond.

The victim, a female student whose life was tragically cut short on February 27, 2025, was killed in an incident that has sparked national outrage and intense scrutiny of campus safety. Her grieving mother, Rejoice Amakie Yabani, shared the suspect’s alleged words as part of a heartbreaking account of the events leading up to the killing, painting a grim picture of jealousy and possessiveness that may have motivated the crime.

Police investigations are ongoing as authorities piece together the timeline and motive behind the murder. The suspect’s reported statement — suggesting a lethal ultimatum over the victim’s loyalties — has intensified public demand for justice and renewed calls for stronger protection for students.

The case continues to dominate headlines as the university, law enforcement, and civil society grapple with the tragedy and its implications for campus security and youth relationships. Families and friends of the victim are awaiting further developments as the legal process unfolds.

A devastating road accident has left twelve people injured, including a five-month-old infant, sending shockwaves through the affected community. Emergency responders rushed to the scene to rescue victims, many of whom sustained serious injuries, following what witnesses describe as a violent collision between two vehicles on a busy highway.

Authorities confirmed that the injured were immediately transported to nearby hospitals for treatment, with medical teams working around the clock to stabilize the most critically hurt, including the baby. Eyewitnesses said the accident occurred in a matter of seconds, leaving mangled vehicles and chaos in its wake.

Police have launched an investigation into the cause of the crash, with early reports suggesting excessive speed or reckless driving may have played a role. Families of the victims are pleading for answers, while the community reels from the tragedy.

The accident underscores ongoing concerns about road safety, particularly in areas with heavy traffic and limited enforcement, as officials vow stricter measures to prevent similar incidents in the future.

In a revelation that has sent shockwaves through Ghana’s charismatic Christian circles, Nicholas Duncan-Williams has explained why he stepped in to block a junior pastor’s planned crusade targeting Dag Heward-Mills.

According to Duncan-Williams, the decision was motivated by a desire to preserve unity and avoid unnecessary conflict within the Christian community. He emphasized that the church should focus on spreading the gospel rather than engaging in public disputes or personal attacks. “Our mission is to build, not to divide,” Duncan-Williams reportedly stated, stressing that spiritual competition should never escalate into confrontation.

The blocked crusade had sparked curiosity and concern among members of the church and the wider public, with many questioning the motives behind the junior pastor’s move. Church insiders say tensions had been rising, and the intervention by Duncan-Williams was a decisive attempt to maintain peace and protect the reputations of both parties involved.

This incident highlights the delicate balance church leaders must strike between authority, mentorship, and freedom of ministry, especially when public perception and interdenominational relationships are at stake. Analysts suggest that Duncan-Williams’ action could serve as a precedent for resolving future internal disputes without letting them spill into the public arena.

The decision has generated mixed reactions online, with supporters praising the emphasis on unity, while critics question whether younger pastors are being unfairly restrained. The story continues to dominate discussions in Ghana’s religious circles.

The spotlight is now on the Economic and Organised Crime Office (EOCO) and its head, Marshall Cromwell, as senior lawyer Samuel Atta Akyea says there are “a lot of questions to answer” amid ongoing legal and investigative drama involving the office.

Atta Akyea, representing former National Signals Bureau Director-General Kwabena Adu‑Boahene, publicly challenged Cromwell’s conduct and decisions in the high-profile case, asserting that the EOCO boss must explain his actions and the direction of the investigation. The comments follow renewed scrutiny of how EOCO has handled Adu‑Boahene’s prosecution and other matters tied to its mandate.

The exchange has sparked intense debate in legal and political circles, with critics questioning EOCO’s transparency, consistency, and adherence to due process under Cromwell’s leadership. Supporters of Atta Akyea argue that the agency must be held publicly accountable, while defenders of EOCO maintain that investigations require discretion and procedural compliance.

This controversy comes at a time when EOCO’s role in tackling serious and organized crime in Ghana has been under greater public and political scrutiny, raising broader questions about institutional independence, prosecutorial strategy, and confidence in anti-crime enforcement.

With pressure mounting, all eyes are on how Marshall Cromwell and EOCO respond — and whether they will address the issues raised by Atta Akyea in a way that satisfies both legal observers and the wider public.