A political storm is brewing as Andrew Egyapa Mercer launches a blistering attack on the National Democratic Congress (NDC), declaring that the party has “absolutely no justification” for awarding contracts through controversial sole-sourcing methods.
In a no-holds-barred critique, the outspoken lawmaker accused the NDC of undermining transparency and sidestepping competitive procurement processes, igniting fresh concerns over accountability in public spending.
“Ghanaians deserve fairness and openness—not backdoor deals,” Mercer reportedly fumed, as he questioned the legitimacy of contracts handed out without competitive bidding. His remarks have sent shockwaves through political circles, intensifying scrutiny on how government deals are awarded.
Sole-sourcing—a process where contracts are given to a single provider without competition—has long been a flashpoint in Ghana’s governance debate. While defenders argue it can be necessary in emergencies or specialized cases, critics insist it often opens the floodgates to favoritism, inflated costs, and corruption.
Mercer doubled down, insisting that the NDC cannot hide behind excuses. According to him, the principles of good governance demand strict adherence to transparent procurement laws—especially at a time when citizens are demanding greater accountability from leaders.
But the controversy doesn’t end there. Political analysts warn that this clash could escalate into a full-blown partisan battle, with both sides digging in over past and present procurement decisions. The NDC is expected to respond, potentially setting the stage for a heated war of words over who truly upholds integrity in public office.
As tensions rise, one question looms large: is this a genuine fight for transparency—or just another chapter in Ghana’s high-stakes political rivalry?
The debate over sole-sourcing is far from settled, and the political temperature is only getting hotter.
