In a bold statement that’s bound to stir debate, Goosie Tanoh, a key figure behind the controversial 24-hour economy policy, has revealed that the much-discussed initiative is NOT mandatory.
Speaking candidly to the press, Tanoh sought to clarify what many have misunderstood about the policy, which has sparked widespread discussions across the nation. The policy, often misconstrued as an overnight shift to round-the-clock business operations, is designed to offer flexibility for businesses—not to enforce a compulsory 24-hour work culture.
Tanoh emphasized that the core idea of the policy is to encourage businesses to operate at times that best suit their needs and customer demand, but not at the cost of worker rights or a mandatory 24/7 system. “It’s about offering choices,” he asserted, slamming rumors and misconceptions that the government was pushing a non-stop economic model.
Key Takeaways:
- Choice, Not Compulsion: Businesses have the freedom to opt into the 24-hour model.
- Worker Protections: The policy aims to protect employee rights, ensuring working hours remain reasonable.
- National Growth: Proponents believe that the initiative could foster growth by creating more jobs and boosting consumer activity at all hours.
With critics raising concerns about exploitation and burnout, Tanoh’s comments come at a time when workers’ unions and business owners alike are demanding clearer guidelines. In the coming weeks, this fiery debate is sure to intensify as the future of the 24-hour economy hangs in the balance.
Is it a revolutionary step towards a more dynamic economy—or a risky gamble on worker welfare? Only time will tell.
