A wave of controversy has erupted after a young applicant who claims to have scored a perfect 100/100 in the CDCFIB Computer-Based Test (CBT) publicly expressed shock and disappointment over his alleged exclusion from the shortlist.
The applicant says he was left devastated after discovering that despite what he describes as a flawless performance in the exam conducted by the Civil Defence, Correctional, Fire and Immigration Services Board, his name was missing from the final list of shortlisted candidates.
In an emotional outcry that has since gone viral, he questioned how a perfect score could fail to translate into progression to the next stage of the recruitment process, suggesting possible errors, technical issues, or unexplained selection criteria.
His complaint has triggered widespread reactions online, with many Nigerians expressing concern over transparency and fairness in recruitment exercises conducted by government agencies.
Some social media users argue that such discrepancies raise serious questions about the integrity of the selection process, while others caution that recruitment outcomes often involve multiple stages beyond CBT scores, including document verification, quotas, and eligibility checks.
The CDCFIB has not yet issued a public response specifically addressing the applicant’s claim, but the situation has intensified calls for clearer communication and greater accountability in public recruitment systems.
Observers say the controversy reflects a broader pattern of distrust in competitive government hiring processes, where applicants often feel sidelined despite strong performances.
As pressure mounts, many are urging the board to clarify its selection criteria and investigate the claims to restore public confidence in the recruitment exercise.
For now, the applicant’s emotional appeal continues to trend online, fueling debate about fairness, merit, and transparency in public service recruitment.
