Lawyer questions legality and practicality of new rules amid growing controversy
Prominent legal expert Rufai Oseni has raised serious concerns over the Senate’s recently passed law on election result transmission, asking pointedly:
“Who decides when there’s no network? This law leaves too many questions unanswered.”
LAW UNDER FIRE
Oseni criticized the legislation, arguing that it could:
- Complicate the declaration of results in areas with poor network coverage
- Open the door to disputes and manipulation
- Place unrealistic burdens on electoral officials
PUBLIC AND LEGAL REACTIONS
The comments have sparked nationwide debate:
- Supporters of Oseni praise him for highlighting potential loopholes
- Others defend the law, claiming it will streamline result reporting and increase transparency
- Legal analysts warn that ambiguities in the law could lead to court challenges
THE BIGGER ISSUE
At the heart of Oseni’s criticism is the question of who holds authority in unforeseen circumstances:
- Network failures
- Technical glitches
- Delays in result transmission
“Laws must be practical and enforceable, not leave room for confusion at critical moments,” Oseni emphasized.
As discussions continue, citizens and lawmakers alike are weighing the balance between transparency, efficiency, and practicality in the country’s election process.
